• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

For many students who are enrolled in IGNOU it is the reviewing of literature can be the most confusing part of the project work. This is especially the case for those working on the ignou mcom course, where academic rigor is expected, however guidance often isn't clear. Students usually inquire if they must write summaries of books, make journal articles more readable, or simply collect quotes. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing that a difference could affect the quality of the entire project.

A literature review is not meant to display how much of the literature you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you have grasped the literature that is relevant to your subject and how your project is integrated into it. IGNOU examiners are particularly interested in this chapter since it showcases your ability to link theory with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you begin writing any article, it must be understood why this section is part of an ignou MCOM project. The literature review serves three principal purposes.

It first shows that the subject you have chosen has been previously studied and is of academic importance. Second, it aids you discern gaps or deficiencies in prior research. The third is that it creates the basis for your research objectives as well as your method of study.

A majority of students view this chapter as a formality and duplicate content from previous assignments or online sources. This practice usually leads to lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU is seeking original and unique writing even when addressing existing research.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU doesn't expect students to write on the scale of a PhD thesis. On the other hand simple explanations are discouraged. For an IGNOU MCOM project synopsis [www.pokernet.dk] master's degree project the literature review should reflect postgraduate-level understanding.

You're expected to study research papers, books and reports, as well as journals or even publications from the government that relate to your topic. The concentration should be on the studies that directly link to the area of your study.

In this case, for example, if your research is focused on the financial performance of banks and banks, then your literature search must focus on earlier research about financial ratios performances of banks, profitability studies, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common error students make is combining too many irrelevant sources. More important is quality than quantity. For a project involving ignou mcom it is recommended that you use between 15 and 20 sturdy sources is usually sufficient should they be selected carefully.

Excellent sources include academic journals well-known books written by renowned authors RBI documents, Government reports and university level research papers. Websites that do not have clear authorship requirements should be avoided.

Always choose studies that are recent most likely from the past ten years. Some older studies are acceptable only if the studies are fundamental in the nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter will improve readability and impression. Instead of writing unstructured summaries, split each literature overview into clear sections.

You can structure the chapter using themes, period method, variables, or methodologies studied. For instance, one section may discuss studies related to the financial performance, while another may focus on liquidity and another one on operational efficiency.

This structure aids in understanding that you're more than just copying content but analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be scholarly but straightforward. Avoid a lot of language and terms. IGNOU values clarity over complexity.

Each study you discuss should include the author name, the year of study, the objective, methodology, as well as major findings. But, don't list them in a linear manner. Make sure to connect one study with the other.

When you've discussed one study, you could highlight how another author's study supported and/or refuted the findings. This way of looking at comparisons adds the depth of your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is to compose the literature review in the form of it is a textbook chapter. Discussing fundamental concepts like the definition of accounting, or the meaning of management should not be included in this article unless they are directly linked to previous studies.

Another error is quoting too much. Your review of literature should be written by you in the style of your personal words. Paraphrasing shows understanding, while copying demonstrates dependency.

Students also forget to link publications to their personal research topic. Every research you present should have a clear connection with your project objectives.

Affiliation Literature Review with Research Gap

One of important outcomes of reviewing the literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU evaluations expect you to be able to demonstrate what prior researchers missed or where more research is required.

After discussing multiple studies, you'll find that a lot of studies focus on large organisations smaller firms were disregarded. Also, earlier studies employed secondary data, however primary data was scarce.

The gap in the picture is the reason for your project ignou mcom. Without it, your plan could seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing a review of literature It is vital to have a correct citation. IGNOU generally follows APA style, but coherence is more important than perfection.

Each study must be mentioned in the reference list at the conclusion of the project. Without references, there is a chance to doubt the authenticity.

Avoid footnotes on literature reviews. In text citations work better and looks more professional in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of the review of literature must be. There is no set amount however, for an ignou MCOM project this chapter typically runs from fifteen hundred and two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on the level of complexity of the topic. A larger topic demands greater research, whereas a specific topic requires fewer but deeper discussions.

Unnecessarily lengthy reviews with no analysis will not help improve marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A studied bank performance and discovered good results

Write as this
Write as this: Author A conducted a research study on the performance of banks using financial ratios, and concluded that profitability increased because of better asset management. The findings were later confirmed by Author B He emphasized the role played by operational efficiency in increasing bank profits.

This is an approach that demonstrates understanding and analysis, which is essential to an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects are denied or delayed because of duplicated literature reviews. Even if you cite previous studies, the language you use must reflect the original.

Make use of plagiarism checking tools whenever possible. If you are able, modify your content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect is more effective than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting an ignou mcom project, make sure you read your literature review carefully. Find out if the study you are reviewing is relevant, whether the flow is consistent, and whether the chapter leads naturally to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter make clear why my research is necessary. If yes, your review on literature will be in the best path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature to complete an ignou mcom research project may initially be challenging, especially for students returning into academics after a time off. But once you recognize that it's about analysis and connections rather than recitation, the challenge becomes manageable.

You should take the time to read, think and write in your own voice. The result of your efforts will be apparent in your final work and frequently makes the difference between an average project and a powerful one.