• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

For many students who are enrolled in IGNOU review, reviewing literature can be the most confusing part of the project work. This is particularly true for students working on an ignou project for mcom, where academic depth is expected. However, guidance usually feels a bit limited. Students usually ask if require a summation of their books, edit journal articles, or simply take notes of quotations. In reality, there is a place between, and knowing that differences can affect the quality of the entire project.

A literature review is not meant to display how much information you've read. It is written to show that you are knowledgeable about the previous work that pertains to your area of study and how your project fits within it. IGNOU MCOM project submission guide (site) reviewers are attentive to the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to link knowledge with research directions.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you write anything, it important to be aware of the reason this chapter is needed in an ignou mcom project. Literature review serves three major purposes.

First, it demonstrates that the area you've selected was studied before as well as having a relevance for academic studies. Second, it aids you detect gaps or deficiencies in earlier research. Thirdly, it gives you the basis for your studies' goals and research methodology.

Many students take this chapter as a formality, and copy content from previous assignments or other online sources. This often results in very low marks or projects being rejected. IGNOU expects original writing even when presenting existing work.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. But those who write merely to explain their ideas are also discouraged. In an ignou project, the review of literature should reflect a postgraduate level of understanding.

You're expected review books, research papers journals, reports or even publications from the government that relate to your area of study. The concentrate should be on studies relevant to your area of study.

As an example, if the task is to study the financial performance of banks the literature review should include earlier studies on financial ratios, bank performance, profitability analysis, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One common mistake students make is selecting a lot of unrelated sources. It's more about quality than quantity. In the case of an ignou MCOM project between 15 and 20 sturdy sources is usually sufficient as long as they're carefully chosen.

Some good sources are academic journals popular books written by well-known author, RBI papers, official reports and even university research papers. Websites that do not have clear authorship requirements should be avoided.

Always look for studies that are more recent and ideally, from the last ten years. Other studies from the past may be considered only if the studies are fundamental in nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter can improve quality of reading and impression. Instead of writing random summaries and essays, you should divide all the reviews of books into logical sections.

You may organize the chapter based on themes, time period methods, or variables investigated. For example, one section might discuss studies on profitability, another may focus on liquidity and the third focus on efficiency in operations.

This format helps evaluaters understand that you're not copying content, but rather analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing should be scholarly but straightforward. Avoid excessive language and terminology. IGNOU is a firm believer in simplicity over clarity.

Each study you analyze should include the name of the author as well as year of study, research objectives, methods, and important findings. But, don't list them in a linear manner. Make sure to connect one study with a different one.

For example, after discussing the findings of one study, you could write about how a different author's research supported or refuted these findings. This approach of comparing studies adds the depth of your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is to write the literature review as an academic chapter. Simply explaining concepts such as understanding of accounting's definition or of management doesn't belong in this section unless it is directly connected with previous research.

Another error is over-quoting. Your literature review should be written in Your own voice. It is a sign of understanding that you are paraphrasing, while copying demonstrates dependency.

They also fail to link books to their own research topic. The research you refer to should be clearly connected to the objectives of your project.

The Linkage Literature Review with Research Gap

One of most important result of the study of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU assessment committees expect you demonstrate what researchers in the past did not realize and where further research is required.

After examining a variety of studies, you will notice that the majority of research was focused on large companies in contrast to small businesses being absent. The earlier studies also used secondary data, but the primary data was not enough.

This gap is the basis for your ignou mcom project. Without it, your project will seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing a review for literature An accurate citation is imperative. IGNOU generally supports APA style, but consistency is more important than perfect.

Every study to be discussed must be included in the reference list at the end of the project. A lack of references may raise doubts as to the study's authenticity.

Avoid footnotes during a literature review. In-text citations are more efficient as it appears cleaner in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long the reviews of books should last. There's no set timeframe to follow, but for an MCOM project, the chapter typically spans from fifteen hundred up to two thousand words.

The length should be determined by topic complexity. For a broad topic, you will need more study, while a specific topic requires fewer but more in-depth discussions.

Writing lengthy reviews that are not needed without an analysis won't help marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A conducted a study of the performance of banks and came up with positive results

Write it like this
Write as this: Author A carried out a study on bank performance using financial ratios and found that profitability improved because of improved asset management. This finding was later supported by Author B in his study, who focused on the role played by the efficiency of operations in enhancing returns for banks.

This approach emphasizes the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is highly valued in an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get refused or delayed because of the use of copied literature reviews. Even if you cite past studies, your language needs to reflect your unique style.

Use plagiarism detection tools if possible. You can also rewrite your content to make it sound natural. A slightly imperfect sentence will be more appealing than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou MCOM project, go through your literature review carefully. Find out if the study you are reviewing is relevant, if the flow of information is clear and whether the chapter naturally leads to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter explain the reason for why I need to study it. If yes then your review on literature will be in the best track.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature for an ignou-mcom project may feel challenging at first Particularly for students returning to school after a long hiatus. If you can realize that it is about connection and analysis, rather that memorization, the work becomes doable.

You should take the time to read, consider, and write in your personal voice. Your effort is evident in your final product and often is the difference between an average submission and a high-quality one.